iPollo V1 Hyd vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Hyd | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 900.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 MH/s |
| 800 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| 888,888.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 846,153.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 8.0 kg | Weight | 2.1 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Hyd
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 73% better power draw (800 vs 220 W). That said, the iPollo V1 Hyd isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Hyd and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo V1 Hyd 246% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 73% better power draw (800 vs 220 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 5% better efficiency (888,889 vs 846,154 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 74% better weight (8.0 vs 2.1 kg)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 264% more heat output (2,730 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 120% more home mining score (30.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Hyd | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| $489 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $650 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$1,190 | Net after 1 year | -$843 |
| -$1,891 | Net after 2 years | -$1,035 |
| -$2,591 | Net after 3 years | -$1,228 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260846,153.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Hyd or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-1.92/day for the iPollo V1 Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Hyd or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Hyd at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Hyd or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Hyd and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH — a difference of 42,735.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficiency (888,889 vs 846,154 J/TH).