Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 620 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-Q edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 72% better power draw (2,200 vs 620 W). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Jasminer X16-Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer E9 Pro 89% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 72% better power draw (2,200 vs 620 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 47% better efficiency (597,826 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Antminer E9 Pro 255% more heat output (7,506 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 63% more home mining score (40.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $789 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,332 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,875 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$2,418 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Jasminer X16-Q?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the Jasminer X16-Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X16-Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and Jasminer X16-Q on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 279,877.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficiency (597,826 vs 317,949 J/TH).