Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 1,580 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 1,398.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,100.0 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 5,391 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK Lite comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better efficiency (1,398 vs 190 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK Lite 458% more hashrate (1.1 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Lite 24% better power draw (1,580 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK Lite 86% better efficiency (1,398 vs 190 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 25% better weight (6,100 vs 8,100 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 32% more heat output (5,391 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Lite 11% more home mining score (28.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $925 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$2,294 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$3,663 | Net after 2 years | -$2,684 |
| -$5,033 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Lite190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or Goldshell CK Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Lite is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-3.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK Lite on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,207.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (1,398 vs 190 J/TH).