Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 2,813 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 9,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 821% more hashrate (58.0 vs 6.3 TH/s). The Goldshell CK Lite claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and Goldshell CK Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 821% more hashrate (58.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Lite 57% better power draw (2,813 vs 1,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 75% better efficiency (48.5 vs 190.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 134% more heat output (9,598 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Lite 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$4.66 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$3,562 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$5,264 | Net after 2 years | -$2,684 |
| -$6,965 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)48.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or Goldshell CK Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Lite is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-4.66/day for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or Goldshell CK Lite?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or the Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell CK Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and Goldshell CK Lite on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 142.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (48.5 vs 190.5 J/TH).