Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 2,813 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 9,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 383% more hashrate (58.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)'s favour. That said, the Goldshell CK5 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and Goldshell CK5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 383% more hashrate (58.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK5 15% better power draw (2,813 vs 2,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 76% better efficiency (48.5 vs 200.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 17% more heat output (9,598 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK5 18% more home mining score (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$4.66 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$3,562 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$5,264 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$6,965 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK5Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)48.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Goldshell CK5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) is more profitable at $-4.66/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or the Goldshell CK5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or the Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell CK5 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Goldshell CK5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 151.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (48.5 vs 200.0 J/TH).