Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) vs iBeLink BM-N1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) | Specification | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.6 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 363.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 9,900.0 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)
iBeLink BM-N1
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 862% more hashrate (63.5 vs 6.6 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-N1 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) and iBeLink BM-N1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 862% more hashrate (63.5 vs 6.6 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-N1 22% better power draw (3,080 vs 2,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 87% better efficiency (48.5 vs 363.6 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 28% more heat output (10,509 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-N1 18% more home mining score (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) | Metric | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$5.52 |
| -$3,724 | Net after 1 year | -$2,016 |
| -$5,588 | Net after 2 years | -$4,031 |
| -$7,452 | Net after 3 years | -$6,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-N1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)48.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) vs iBeLink BM-N1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) is more profitable at $-5.11/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) or iBeLink BM-N1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) or iBeLink BM-N1?
The iBeLink BM-N1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) and iBeLink BM-N1?
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH — a difference of 315.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (48.5 vs 363.6 J/TH).