Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs IceRiver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,188 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
IceRiver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 8200% more hashrate (8.3 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)'s favour. That said, the IceRiver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and IceRiver KS0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 8200% more hashrate (8.3 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (3,188.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 41% better efficiency (384 vs 650 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 4804% more heat output (10,878 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 223% more home mining score (22.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$155 |
| -$9,217 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)384.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or IceRiver KS0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or the IceRiver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs IceRiver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and IceRiver KS0 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 265.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficiency (384 vs 650 J/TH).