Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs Iceriver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,188 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
Iceriver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS5L comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 45% more hashrate (8.3 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS5L's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and Iceriver KS5L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS5L 45% more hashrate (8.3 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 6% better power draw (3,188 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS5L 26% better efficiency (384 vs 283 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS5L 7% more heat output (10,878 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS5L 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $400 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$3,221 |
| -$9,218 | Net after 2 years | -$6,042 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$8,863 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS5LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or the Iceriver KS5L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) is more profitable at $-7.35/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or Iceriver KS5L?
The Iceriver KS5L is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs Iceriver KS5L: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS5L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and Iceriver KS5L on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 100.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficiency (384 vs 283 J/TH).