Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 88% more hashrate (9.4 vs 5.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)'s favour. The IceRiver KS3L holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and IceRiver KS3L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 88% more hashrate (9.4 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3L 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 42% better efficiency (372 vs 640 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 19% better weight (17.7 vs 14.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3L 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$5,443 | Net after 1 year | -$10,238 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$11,328 | Net after 3 years | -$15,713 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs IceRiver KS3L: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3L is more profitable at $-7.50/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs IceRiver KS3L: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS3L is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the IceRiver KS3L?
The IceRiver KS3L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs IceRiver KS3L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 267.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (372 vs 640 J/TH).