Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 800.0 MH/s |
| 3,680 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 184,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| — | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 12,556 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 2400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 2400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 86% better power draw (3,680 vs 500 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 71% better efficiency (184,000 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 636% more heat output (12,556 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 107% more home mining score (30.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $6,199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$8.83 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$9,422 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$12,646 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$15,869 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)184,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-8.83/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) runs at 184,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 441,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficiency (184,000 vs 625,000 J/TH).