Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs FusionSilicon X6 Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Specification | FusionSilicon X6 Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 860.0 MH/s |
| 800 W | Power Consumption | 1,079 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,254,651.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 4,300.0 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,682 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | FusionSilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
FusionSilicon X6 Miner
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the FusionSilicon X6 Miner wins on 2 of 3 factors (efficiency, home mining score). The standout gap is 71% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the FusionSilicon X6 Miner's favour. The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and FusionSilicon X6 Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- FusionSilicon X6 Miner 71% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 26% better power draw (800 vs 1,079 W)
- FusionSilicon X6 Miner 21% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 1,254,651 J/TH)
- FusionSilicon X6 Miner 2% better weight (4,400 vs 4,300 kg)
- FusionSilicon X6 Miner 35% more heat output (2,730 vs 3,682 BTU/hr)
- FusionSilicon X6 Miner 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Metric | FusionSilicon X6 Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$2.59 |
| -$866 | Net after 1 year | -$945 |
| -$1,567 | Net after 2 years | -$1,890 |
| -$2,267 | Net after 3 years | -$2,836 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FusionSilicon X6 MinerScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FusionSilicon X6 Miner1,254,651.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs FusionSilicon X6 Miner: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-2.59/day for the FusionSilicon X6 Miner. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or the FusionSilicon X6 Miner better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or the FusionSilicon X6 Miner?
The FusionSilicon X6 Miner scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and FusionSilicon X6 Miner on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the FusionSilicon X6 Miner runs at 1,254,651.2 J/TH — a difference of 332,650.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 1,254,651 J/TH).