Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs VOLCMINER D1 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | VOLCMINER D1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 18.0 GH/s |
| 942 W | Power Consumption | 3,500 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 194,444.4 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 21.0 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | VOLCMINER |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
VOLCMINER D1 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the VOLCMINER D1 Pro edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 3003% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the VOLCMINER D1 Pro's favour. The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and VOLCMINER D1 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 3003% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 73% better power draw (942 vs 3,500 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 88% better efficiency (1,624,138 vs 194,444 J/TH)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 21.0 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 272% more heat output (3,214 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 16% more home mining score (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | VOLCMINER D1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,850 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$8.40 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$10,916 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$13,982 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$17,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
VOLCMINER D1 ProScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 Pro194,444.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the VOLCMINER D1 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-8.40/day for the VOLCMINER D1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or VOLCMINER D1 Pro?
The VOLCMINER D1 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the VOLCMINER D1 Pro?
The VOLCMINER D1 Pro scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs VOLCMINER D1 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D1 Pro runs at 194,444.4 J/TH — a difference of 1,429,693.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficiency (1,624,138 vs 194,444 J/TH).