Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) | Specification | VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 596.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 16.2 GH/s |
| 1,050 W | Power Consumption | 3,700 W |
| 1,761,745.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 228,395.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,600.0 kg | Weight | 15.6 kg |
| 3,583 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,624 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | VOLCMINER |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh)
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 2618% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) and VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) sit on each measurable spec:
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 2618% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) 72% better power draw (1,050 vs 3,700 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 87% better efficiency (1,761,745 vs 228,395 J/TH)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 100% better weight (4,600.0 vs 15.6 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 252% more heat output (3,583 vs 12,624 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) | Metric | VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.52 | Daily net profit | -$8.88 |
| -$2,110 | Net after 1 year | -$3,241 |
| -$3,030 | Net after 2 years | -$6,482 |
| -$3,949 | Net after 3 years | -$9,723 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)228,395.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) is more profitable at $-2.52/day compared to $-8.88/day for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) or VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)?
The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) or VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) runs at 1,761,745.0 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) runs at 228,395.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,533,349.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (1,761,745 vs 228,395 J/TH).