Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 600.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 16.0 GH/s |
| 850 W | Power Consumption | 3,360 W |
| 1,416,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 210,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,900 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh), which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 2567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 2567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) 75% better power draw (850 vs 3,360 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 85% better efficiency (1,416,667 vs 210,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 295% more heat output (2,900 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,199 |
| -$2.04 | Daily net profit | -$8.06 |
| -$910 | Net after 1 year | -$6,142 |
| -$1,654 | Net after 2 years | -$9,085 |
| -$2,399 | Net after 3 years | -$12,028 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) is more profitable at $-2.04/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) runs at 1,416,666.7 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,206,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (1,416,667 vs 210,000 J/TH).