Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) vs Elphapex DG 1+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) | Specification | Elphapex DG 1+ |
|---|---|---|
| 600.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 14.0 GH/s |
| 850 W | Power Consumption | 3,920 W |
| 1,416,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 280,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 18.3 kg |
| 2,900 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,375 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh)
Elphapex DG 1+
Based on BTC price of $76,413 and current network difficulty as of May 19, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Elphapex DG 1+, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 2233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) and Elphapex DG 1+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Elphapex DG 1+ 2233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) 78% better power draw (850 vs 3,920 W)
- Elphapex DG 1+ 80% better efficiency (1,416,667 vs 280,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG 1+ 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 18.3 kg)
- Elphapex DG 1+ 361% more heat output (2,900 vs 13,375 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG 1+ 7% more home mining score (28.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) | Metric | Elphapex DG 1+ |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,452 |
| -$2.04 | Daily net profit | -$9.41 |
| -$910 | Net after 1 year | -$4,885 |
| -$1,654 | Net after 2 years | -$8,319 |
| -$2,399 | Net after 3 years | -$11,753 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG 1+Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG 1+280,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) vs Elphapex DG 1+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) is more profitable at $-2.04/day compared to $-9.41/day for the Elphapex DG 1+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or the Elphapex DG 1+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Elphapex DG 1+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or the Elphapex DG 1+?
The Elphapex DG 1+ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) and Elphapex DG 1+?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) runs at 1,416,666.7 J/TH while the Elphapex DG 1+ runs at 280,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,136,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficiency (1,416,667 vs 280,000 J/TH).