Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 GH/s | Hashrate | 420.0 MH/s |
| 3,425 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 360,526.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 952,381.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
Goldshell Mini Doge II
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 2162% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell Mini Doge II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 2162% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 88% better power draw (3,425 vs 400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 62% better efficiency (360,526 vs 952,381 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 100% better weight (15,000.0 vs 2.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 756% more heat output (11,686 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 214% more home mining score (22.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| $821 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $258 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$3,822 | Net after 1 year | -$608 |
| -$6,822 | Net after 2 years | -$959 |
| -$9,822 | Net after 3 years | -$1,309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini Doge IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)360,526.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini Doge II is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) or Goldshell Mini Doge II?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) runs at 360,526.3 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini Doge II runs at 952,381.0 J/TH — a difference of 591,854.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (360,526 vs 952,381 J/TH).