Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) vs Elphapex DG2 Mini
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Specification | Elphapex DG2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| 17.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 2.4 GH/s |
| 3,570 W | Power Consumption | 530 W |
| 210,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 220,833.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 4.5 kg |
| 12,181 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,808 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)
Elphapex DG2 Mini
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 608% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Elphapex DG2 Mini claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and Elphapex DG2 Mini diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 608% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 85% better power draw (3,570 vs 530 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 5% better efficiency (210,000 vs 220,833 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 67% better weight (13.5 vs 4.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 574% more heat output (12,181 vs 1,808 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 93% more home mining score (30.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Metric | Elphapex DG2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| $3,380 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$8.57 | Daily net profit | -$1.27 |
| -$6,507 | Net after 1 year | -$1,463 |
| -$9,634 | Net after 2 years | -$1,927 |
| -$12,761 | Net after 3 years | -$2,392 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG2 MiniScore: 58/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or Elphapex DG2 Mini more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG2 Mini is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-8.57/day for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or the Elphapex DG2 Mini better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Elphapex DG2 Mini is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or the Elphapex DG2 Mini?
The Elphapex DG2 Mini scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and Elphapex DG2 Mini on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG2 Mini runs at 220,833.3 J/TH — a difference of 10,833.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficiency (210,000 vs 220,833 J/TH).