Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| 17.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 420.0 MH/s |
| 3,570 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 210,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 952,381.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 12,181 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)
Goldshell Mini Doge II
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 3948% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell Mini Doge II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 3948% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 89% better power draw (3,570 vs 400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 78% better efficiency (210,000 vs 952,381 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 83% better weight (13.5 vs 2.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 792% more heat output (12,181 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 130% more home mining score (30.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| $3,380 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $258 |
| -$8.57 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$6,507 | Net after 1 year | -$608 |
| -$9,634 | Net after 2 years | -$959 |
| -$12,761 | Net after 3 years | -$1,309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini Doge IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini Doge II is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-8.57/day for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini Doge II runs at 952,381.0 J/TH — a difference of 742,381.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficiency (210,000 vs 952,381 J/TH).