Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer L9

Antminer L9

Hashrate 16,000.0 MH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210,000.0 J/TH
VS
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)

Hashrate 16.2 GH/s Power 3,700 W Efficiency 228,395.1 J/TH

Antminer L9 vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer L9 Specification VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
16,000.0 MH/s Hashrate 16.2 GH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 3,700 W
210,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 228,395.1 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.8 kg Weight 15.6 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,624 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Bitmain Manufacturer VOLCMINER

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer L9

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$8.06
Monthly -$241.90
Yearly -$2,943.15

VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.88
Daily Profit -$8.88
Monthly -$266.38
Yearly -$3,240.99

Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer L9 edges it: 3 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 9% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,700 W). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer L9 — wins on 3 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer L9 and VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) sit on each measurable spec:

  • VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 1% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer L9 9% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,700 W)
  • Antminer L9 8% better efficiency (210,000 vs 228,395 J/TH)
  • Antminer L9 5% better weight (14.8 vs 15.6 kg)
  • VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 10% more heat output (11,464 vs 12,624 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer L9 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer L9 Metric VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
$6,500 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$8.06 Daily net profit -$8.88
-$9,443 Net after 1 year -$3,241
-$12,386 Net after 2 years -$6,482
-$15,329 Net after 3 years -$9,723
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer L9

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer L9

210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer L9 or VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L9 is more profitable at $-8.06/day compared to $-8.88/day for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer L9 or the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer L9 vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh): which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer L9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer L9 vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer L9 runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) runs at 228,395.1 J/TH — a difference of 18,395.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficiency (210,000 vs 228,395 J/TH).