Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 236.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Power Consumption | 3,422 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 11,000.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,676 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70
Based on BTC price of $79,067 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 223% more hashrate (73.0 vs 236.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 223% more hashrate (73.0 vs 236.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 15% better power draw (2,920 vs 3,422 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 64% better efficiency (40.0 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 100% better weight (11,000.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 17% more heat output (9,963 vs 11,676 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 |
|---|---|---|
| $550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.35 | Daily net profit | $0.37 |
| -$2,138 | Net after 1 year | +$137 |
| -$3,727 | Net after 2 years | +$273 |
| -$5,315 | Net after 3 years | +$410 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70$4.73/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7014.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 is more profitable at $0.37/day compared to $-4.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 25.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (40.0 vs 14.5 J/TH).