Antminer S17+ vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17+ | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 13.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Power Consumption | 1,280 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,367 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17+
Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,271 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S17+ wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 462% more hashrate (73.0 vs 13.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S17+ and Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S17+ 462% more hashrate (73.0 vs 13.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 56% better power draw (2,920 vs 1,280 W)
- Antminer S17+ 59% better efficiency (40.0 vs 98.5 J/TH)
- Antminer S17+ 100% better weight (9.5 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Antminer S17+ 128% more heat output (9,963 vs 4,367 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17+ 171% more home mining score (84.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S17+ | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$4.35 | Daily net profit | -$2.60 |
| -$1,586 | Net after 1 year | -$1,013 |
| -$3,172 | Net after 2 years | -$1,961 |
| -$4,758 | Net after 3 years | -$2,910 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17+40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S17+ vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.60/day compared to $-4.35/day for the Antminer S17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S17+ vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S17+ or Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)?
The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S17+ and Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) runs at 98.5 J/TH — a difference of 58.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficiency (40.0 vs 98.5 J/TH).