Antminer S17+ vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17+ | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 126.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Power Consumption | 3,276 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17+
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M50S wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 73% more hashrate (73.0 vs 126.0 TH/s). The Antminer S17+ claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S17+ and Whatsminer M50S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50S 73% more hashrate (73.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17+ 11% better power draw (2,920 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 35% better efficiency (40.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S17+ 26% better weight (9.5 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 12% more heat output (9,963 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17+ 133% more home mining score (84.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S17+ | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$4.35 | Daily net profit | -$3.28 |
| -$1,589 | Net after 1 year | -$4,397 |
| -$3,177 | Net after 2 years | -$5,594 |
| -$4,766 | Net after 3 years | -$6,790 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17+ or Whatsminer M50S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.28/day compared to $-4.35/day for the Antminer S17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S17+ vs Whatsminer M50S: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17+ or the Whatsminer M50S?
The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M50S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S17+ vs Whatsminer M50S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 14.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficiency (40.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).