MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 126.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,276 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 10,700.0 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M50S, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 59% better efficiency (63.6 vs 26.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M50S sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50S 129% more hashrate (55.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M50S 6% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 59% better efficiency (63.6 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S 100% better weight (10,700.0 vs 12.8 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 7% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$6.42 | Daily net profit | -$3.33 |
| -$6,144 | Net after 1 year | -$4,415 |
| -$8,487 | Net after 2 years | -$5,630 |
| -$10,831 | Net after 3 years | -$6,845 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or Whatsminer M50S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.33/day compared to $-6.42/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M50S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the Whatsminer M50S?
The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M50S?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 37.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficiency (63.6 vs 26.0 J/TH).