MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 126.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Power Consumption | 3,276 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M50S wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 282% more hashrate (33.0 vs 126.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M50S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50S 282% more hashrate (33.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 35% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 60% better efficiency (65.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S 100% better weight (8,550.0 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 53% more heat output (7,319 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | -$3.33 |
| -$3,946 | Net after 1 year | -$4,415 |
| -$5,391 | Net after 2 years | -$5,630 |
| -$6,837 | Net after 3 years | -$6,845 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.33/day compared to $-3.96/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the Whatsminer M50S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M50S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 39.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (65.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).