Antminer S17 Pro vs Canaan Avalon A1566I
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17 Pro | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 249.0 TH/s |
| 2,212 W | Power Consumption | 4,500 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 11.3 kg |
| 7,547 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 15,354 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17 Pro
Canaan Avalon A1566I
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan Avalon A1566I wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 345% more hashrate (56.0 vs 249.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer S17 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S17 Pro and Canaan Avalon A1566I diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 345% more hashrate (56.0 vs 249.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 Pro 51% better power draw (2,212 vs 4,500 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 54% better efficiency (39.5 vs 18.1 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer S17 Pro 16% better weight (9.5 vs 11.3 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 103% more heat output (7,547 vs 15,354 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 Pro 91% more home mining score (84.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S17 Pro | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,710 |
| -$3.27 | Daily net profit | -$1.74 |
| -$1,194 | Net after 1 year | -$3,346 |
| -$2,388 | Net after 2 years | -$3,982 |
| -$3,582 | Net after 3 years | -$4,617 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17 ProScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566I18.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17 Pro or Canaan Avalon A1566I more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566I is more profitable at $-1.74/day compared to $-3.27/day for the Antminer S17 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S17 Pro vs Canaan Avalon A1566I: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer S17 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S17 Pro or Canaan Avalon A1566I?
The Antminer S17 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566I). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S17 Pro vs Canaan Avalon A1566I: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566I runs at 18.1 J/TH — a difference of 21.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficiency (39.5 vs 18.1 J/TH).