Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the NerdOctaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 94% better power draw (3,250 vs 200 W). The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and NerdOctaxe Gamma diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 1275% more hashrate (110.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 94% better power draw (3,250 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 15% better efficiency (29.6 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 0.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 1525% more heat output (11,089 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 177% more home mining score (22.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$3.80 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$1,746 | Net after 1 year | -$668 |
| -$3,132 | Net after 2 years | -$737 |
| -$4,518 | Net after 3 years | -$806 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the NerdOctaxe Gamma?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-3.80/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which runs at a lower noise level?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (29.6 vs 25.0 J/TH).