Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 126.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 3,276 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $79,123 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M50S comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 15% more hashrate (110 vs 126 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Whatsminer M50S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50S 15% more hashrate (110 vs 126 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 1% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 12% better efficiency (29.6 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 1% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$3.79 | Daily net profit | -$3.27 |
| -$1,745 | Net after 1 year | -$4,395 |
| -$3,130 | Net after 2 years | -$5,590 |
| -$4,515 | Net after 3 years | -$6,786 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Whatsminer M50S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.27/day compared to $-3.79/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or Whatsminer M50S?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or Whatsminer M50S?
The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M50S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 3.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (29.6 vs 26.0 J/TH).