Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 332.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 90.0 TH/s |
| 5,644 W | Power Consumption | 1,674 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 19,257 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $79,059 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 269% more hashrate (332.0 vs 90.0 TH/s). The Canaan Avalon Q holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and Canaan Avalon Q diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 269% more hashrate (332.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 70% better power draw (5,644 vs 1,674 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 9% better efficiency (17.0 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 18% better noise (55.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Q 18% better weight (12.8 vs 10.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 237% more heat output (19,257 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 27% more home mining score (44.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$1.47 | Daily net profit | -$0.74 |
| -$2,334 | Net after 1 year | -$1,563 |
| -$2,870 | Net after 2 years | -$1,834 |
| -$3,405 | Net after 3 years | -$2,106 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Canaan Avalon Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.74/day compared to $-1.47/day for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Canaan Avalon Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or the Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Canaan Avalon Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 1.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (17.0 vs 18.6 J/TH).