Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 84.0 TH/s |
| 5,510 W | Power Consumption | 3,150 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 37.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 18,800 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,748 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,115 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 590% more hashrate (580.0 vs 84.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 590% more hashrate (580.0 vs 84.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 43% better power draw (5,510 vs 3,150 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 75% better efficiency (9.5 vs 37.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 100% better weight (13.5 vs 14,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 75% more heat output (18,800 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 36% more home mining score (30.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $12,995 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $179 |
| $7.89 | Daily net profit | -$4.50 |
| -$10,114 | Net after 1 year | -$1,822 |
| -$7,234 | Net after 2 years | -$3,465 |
| -$4,353 | Net after 3 years | -$5,108 |
| Takes ~4.5 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd$12.39/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23 HydScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is more profitable at $7.89/day compared to $-4.50/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd runs at 9.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 28.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (9.5 vs 37.5 J/TH).