Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S7 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 TH/s | Hashrate | 90.0 TH/s |
| 1,293 W | Power Consumption | 1,674 W |
| 273.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 3,900.0 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 4,412 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S7
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $79,084 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon Q comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 1803% more hashrate (4.7 vs 90.0 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon Q's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S7 holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S7 and Canaan Avalon Q actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon Q 1803% more hashrate (4.7 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S7 23% better power draw (1,293 vs 1,674 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 93% better efficiency (273.4 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 100% better weight (3,900.0 vs 10.5 kg)
- Canaan Avalon Q 29% more heat output (4,412 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 81% more home mining score (31.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S7 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$2.93 | Daily net profit | -$0.74 |
| -$1,070 | Net after 1 year | -$1,563 |
| -$2,140 | Net after 2 years | -$1,833 |
| -$3,210 | Net after 3 years | -$2,104 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Canaan Avalon Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.74/day compared to $-2.93/day for the Bitmain Antminer S7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Canaan Avalon Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S7 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Canaan Avalon Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S7 and Canaan Avalon Q on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S7 runs at 273.4 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 254.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 93% better efficiency (273.4 vs 18.6 J/TH).