Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 90.0 TH/s |
| 1,728 W | Power Consumption | 1,674 W |
| 96.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 5,150.0 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 5,896 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $79,065 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon Q edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 81% better efficiency (96.0 vs 18.6 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) and Canaan Avalon Q actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon Q 400% more hashrate (18.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 3% better power draw (1,728 vs 1,674 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 81% better efficiency (96.0 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 100% better weight (5,150.0 vs 10.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 3% more heat output (5,896 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 100% more home mining score (28.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$3.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.74 |
| -$1,275 | Net after 1 year | -$1,563 |
| -$2,549 | Net after 2 years | -$1,834 |
| -$3,824 | Net after 3 years | -$2,105 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Canaan Avalon Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.74/day compared to $-3.49/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Canaan Avalon Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Canaan Avalon Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) runs at 96.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 77.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (96.0 vs 18.6 J/TH).