Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 1,280 W Efficiency 80.0 J/TH

Innosilicon T3 50T

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)	Specification	Innosilicon T3 50T
16.0 TH/s	Hashrate	50.0 TH/s
1,280 W	Power Consumption	3,100 W
80.0 J/TH	Efficiency	62.0 J/TH
—	Noise Level	—
4,560.0 kg	Weight	10,000.0 kg
4,367 BTU/hr	BTU Output	10,577 BTU/hr
31/100	Home Mining Score	22/100
—	Release Year	—
SHA-256	Algorithm	SHA-256
Bitmain	Manufacturer	Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58

Daily Electricity -$3.07

Daily Profit -$2.49

Monthly -$74.69

Yearly -$908.74

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.82

Daily Electricity -$7.44

Daily Profit -$5.62

Monthly -$168.61

Yearly -$2,051.41

Based on BTC price of $79,086 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Innosilicon T3 50T edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 213% more hashrate (16.0 vs 50.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 50T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Innosilicon T3 50T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

Innosilicon T3 50T 213% more hashrate (16.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 59% better power draw (1,280 vs 3,100 W)
Innosilicon T3 50T 23% better efficiency (80.0 vs 62.0 J/TH)
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 54% better weight (4,560 vs 10,000 kg)
Innosilicon T3 50T 142% more heat output (4,367 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 50T

62.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Innosilicon T3 50T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Innosilicon T3 50T?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Innosilicon T3 50T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 18.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficiency (80.0 vs 62.0 J/TH).

Compare Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) with...

Compare Innosilicon T3 50T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.