Antminer S9j vs Whatsminer M60S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S9j | Specification | Whatsminer M60S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 14.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 220.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 3,960 W |
| 93.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,512 BTU/hr |
| 83/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S9j
Whatsminer M60S++
Based on BTC price of $79,070 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M60S++, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 1417% more hashrate (14.5 vs 220.0 TH/s). The Antminer S9j holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S9j and Whatsminer M60S++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M60S++ 1417% more hashrate (14.5 vs 220.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S9j 66% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,960 W)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 81% better efficiency (93.1 vs 18.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer S9j 70% better weight (4.2 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 193% more heat output (4,606 vs 13,512 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S9j 177% more home mining score (83.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S9j | Metric | Whatsminer M60S++ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,000 |
| -$2.71 | Daily net profit | -$1.50 |
| -$990 | Net after 1 year | -$7,547 |
| -$1,980 | Net after 2 years | -$8,094 |
| -$2,970 | Net after 3 years | -$8,641 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S9jScore: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S++18.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S9j vs Whatsminer M60S++: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S++ is more profitable at $-1.50/day compared to $-2.71/day for the Antminer S9j. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S9j or the Whatsminer M60S++ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M60S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer S9j at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S9j or Whatsminer M60S++?
The Antminer S9j scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Whatsminer M60S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S9j and Whatsminer M60S++ on J/TH?
The Antminer S9j runs at 93.1 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S++ runs at 18.0 J/TH — a difference of 75.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (93.1 vs 18.0 J/TH).