Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer S9j

Antminer S9j

Hashrate 14.5 TH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 93.1 J/TH

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S9j

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer AL1 Specification Antminer S9j
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 14.5 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 1,350 W
210.0 J/TH Efficiency 93.1 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 76 dB
14.5 kg Weight 4.2 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,606 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 83/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.57
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.50
Monthly -$224.93
Yearly -$2,736.67

Antminer S9j

Daily Revenue 0.00000667 BTC $0.51
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$2.73
Monthly -$81.80
Yearly -$995.29

Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S9j wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 60% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,350 W). The Antminer AL1 claws back ground on hashrate and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer S9j — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Antminer S9j actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer AL1 10% more hashrate (16.0 vs 14.5 TH/s)
  • Antminer S9j 60% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,350 W)
  • Antminer S9j 56% better efficiency (210.0 vs 93.1 J/TH)
  • Antminer AL1 1% better noise (75.0 vs 76.0 dB)
  • Antminer S9j 71% better weight (14.5 vs 4.2 kg)
  • Antminer AL1 149% more heat output (11,464 vs 4,606 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S9j 131% more home mining score (36.0 vs 83.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer AL1 Metric Antminer S9j
$10,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.50 Daily net profit -$2.73
-$12,737 Net after 1 year -$995
-$15,473 Net after 2 years -$1,991
-$18,210 Net after 3 years -$2,986
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S9j

Score: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S9j

93.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S9j: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S9j is more profitable at $-2.73/day compared to $-7.50/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S9j: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer S9j at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S9j: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S9j scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Antminer S9j?

The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer S9j runs at 93.1 J/TH — a difference of 116.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (210.0 vs 93.1 J/TH).