Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Antminer T19
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Antminer T19 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 84.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Power Consumption | 3,150 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 37.5 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,748 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Antminer T19
Based on BTC price of $79,163 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T19 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 600% more hashrate (12.0 vs 84.0 TH/s). The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Antminer T19 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer T19 600% more hashrate (12.0 vs 84.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 65% better power draw (1,100 vs 3,150 W)
- Antminer T19 59% better efficiency (91.7 vs 37.5 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 76% better weight (3.5 vs 14.4 kg)
- Antminer T19 186% more heat output (3,753 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T19 62% more home mining score (52.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Antminer T19 |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$2.19 | Daily net profit | -$4.40 |
| -$1,149 | Net after 1 year | -$3,408 |
| -$1,948 | Net after 2 years | -$5,015 |
| -$2,747 | Net after 3 years | -$6,623 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T19Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T1937.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Antminer T19: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.19/day compared to $-4.40/day for the Antminer T19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Antminer T19: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Antminer T19 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Antminer T19: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer T19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Antminer T19 on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Antminer T19 runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 54.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficiency (91.7 vs 37.5 J/TH).