Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer D7

Antminer D7

Hashrate 1,286.0 GH/s Power 3,148 W Efficiency 2,447.9 J/TH
VS
Antminer T19

Antminer T19

Hashrate 84.0 TH/s Power 3,150 W Efficiency 37.5 J/TH

Antminer D7 vs Antminer T19

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D7 Specification Antminer T19
1,286.0 GH/s Hashrate 84.0 TH/s
3,148 W Power Consumption 3,150 W
2,447.9 J/TH Efficiency 37.5 J/TH
70 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.4 kg Weight 14.4 kg
10,741 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,748 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 84/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D7

Daily Revenue 0.00000059 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$7.51
Monthly -$225.27
Yearly -$2,740.77

Antminer T19

Daily Revenue 0.00003866 BTC $3.02
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$4.54
Monthly -$136.20
Yearly -$1,657.13

Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer T19 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 6432% more hashrate (1.3 vs 84.0 TH/s). The Antminer D7 claws back ground on power consumption and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer T19 — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer D7 and Antminer T19 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer T19 6432% more hashrate (1.3 vs 84.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer T19 98% better efficiency (2,447.9 vs 37.5 J/TH)
  • Antminer D7 7% better noise (70.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Antminer T19 133% more home mining score (36.0 vs 84.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer D7 Metric Antminer T19
$2,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,800
-$7.51 Daily net profit -$4.54
-$5,241 Net after 1 year -$3,457
-$7,982 Net after 2 years -$5,114
-$10,722 Net after 3 years -$6,771
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T19

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T19

37.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer D7 or Antminer T19 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer T19 is more profitable at $-4.54/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Antminer D7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer D7 or the Antminer T19 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Antminer T19 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D7 or Antminer T19?

The Antminer T19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer D7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D7 and Antminer T19?

The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Antminer T19 runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 2,410.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficiency (2,447.9 vs 37.5 J/TH).