Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer K7

Antminer K7

Hashrate 63.5 TH/s Power 3,080 W Efficiency 48.5 J/TH
VS
Antminer T19

Antminer T19

Hashrate 84.0 TH/s Power 3,150 W Efficiency 37.5 J/TH

Antminer K7 vs Antminer T19

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer K7 Specification Antminer T19
63.5 TH/s Hashrate 84.0 TH/s
3,080 W Power Consumption 3,150 W
48.5 J/TH Efficiency 37.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.0 kg Weight 14.4 kg
10,509 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,748 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 84/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer K7

Daily Revenue 0.00002922 BTC $2.28
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.26
Yearly -$1,864.66

Antminer T19

Daily Revenue 0.00003866 BTC $3.02
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$4.54
Monthly -$136.19
Yearly -$1,656.92

Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer T19 wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 32% more hashrate (63.5 vs 84.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer K7 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer T19 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer K7 and Antminer T19 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer T19 32% more hashrate (63.5 vs 84.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer K7 2% better power draw (3,080 vs 3,150 W)
  • Antminer T19 23% better efficiency (48.5 vs 37.5 J/TH)
  • Antminer K7 3% better weight (14.0 vs 14.4 kg)
  • Antminer T19 2% more heat output (10,509 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer T19 133% more home mining score (36.0 vs 84.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer K7 Metric Antminer T19
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,800
-$5.11 Daily net profit -$4.54
-$5,365 Net after 1 year -$3,457
-$7,229 Net after 2 years -$5,114
-$9,094 Net after 3 years -$6,771
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T19

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T19

37.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer K7 vs Antminer T19: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer T19 is more profitable at $-4.54/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer K7 or Antminer T19?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer K7 vs Antminer T19: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer T19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer K7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer K7 and Antminer T19 on J/TH?

The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Antminer T19 runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 11.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficiency (48.5 vs 37.5 J/TH).