Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer T19

Antminer T19

Hashrate 84.0 TH/s Power 3,150 W Efficiency 37.5 J/TH
VS
DragonMint T1

DragonMint T1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 1,480 W Efficiency 92.5 J/TH

Antminer T19 vs DragonMint T1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer T19 Specification DragonMint T1
84.0 TH/s Hashrate 16.0 TH/s
3,150 W Power Consumption 1,480 W
37.5 J/TH Efficiency 92.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.4 kg Weight 6.0 kg
10,748 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,050 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 48/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Halong Mining

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer T19

Daily Revenue 0.00003866 BTC $3.06
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$4.50
Monthly -$135.08
Yearly -$1,643.53

DragonMint T1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$3.55
Daily Profit -$2.97
Monthly -$89.09
Yearly -$1,083.93

Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer T19 wins on 3 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 425% more hashrate (84.0 vs 16.0 TH/s). The DragonMint T1 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer T19 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer T19 and DragonMint T1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer T19 425% more hashrate (84.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
  • DragonMint T1 53% better power draw (3,150 vs 1,480 W)
  • Antminer T19 59% better efficiency (37.5 vs 92.5 J/TH)
  • DragonMint T1 58% better weight (14.4 vs 6.0 kg)
  • Antminer T19 113% more heat output (10,748 vs 5,050 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer T19 75% more home mining score (84.0 vs 48.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer T19 Metric DragonMint T1
$1,800 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$4.50 Daily net profit -$2.97
-$3,444 Net after 1 year -$1,084
-$5,087 Net after 2 years -$2,168
-$6,731 Net after 3 years -$3,252
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T19

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T19

37.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer T19 or DragonMint T1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the DragonMint T1 is more profitable at $-2.97/day compared to $-4.50/day for the Antminer T19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer T19 or DragonMint T1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer T19 vs DragonMint T1: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer T19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 48/100 for the DragonMint T1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer T19 vs DragonMint T1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer T19 runs at 37.5 J/TH while the DragonMint T1 runs at 92.5 J/TH — a difference of 55.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficiency (37.5 vs 92.5 J/TH).