Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs DragonMint T1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | DragonMint T1 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 16.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 1,480 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 92.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 6.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,050 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 48/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Halong Mining |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
DragonMint T1
Based on BTC price of $78,221 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the DragonMint T1, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 14% more hashrate (14.0 vs 16.0 TH/s). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and DragonMint T1 sit on each measurable spec:
- DragonMint T1 14% more hashrate (14.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 9% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,480 W)
- DragonMint T1 4% better efficiency (96.4 vs 92.5 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- DragonMint T1 10% more heat output (4,606 vs 5,050 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 23% more home mining score (59.0 vs 48.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | DragonMint T1 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$2.98 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,086 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$2,173 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$3,259 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
DragonMint T192.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the DragonMint T1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-2.98/day for the DragonMint T1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs DragonMint T1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the DragonMint T1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs DragonMint T1: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 48/100 for the DragonMint T1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs DragonMint T1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the DragonMint T1 runs at 92.5 J/TH — a difference of 3.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficiency (96.4 vs 92.5 J/TH).