Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Specification | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 137.0 GH/s |
| 1,432 W | Power Consumption | 3 W |
| 136.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,886 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Intel |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (1,432.0 vs 2.5 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 7564% more hashrate (10.5 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (1,432.0 vs 2.5 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 87% better efficiency (136.4 vs 18.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 57382% more heat output (4,886.0 vs 8.5 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Metric | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.05 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$2,070 | Net after 1 year | -$0 |
| -$3,185 | Net after 2 years | -$1 |
| -$4,300 | Net after 3 years | -$1 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.05/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH while the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH — a difference of 118.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (136.4 vs 18.3 J/TH).