Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

1325 Rue Bergar, Laval, QC support@d-central.tech 1-855-753-9997 Mon-Fri: 8:30 - 18:00

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Hashrate 375.0 TH/s Power 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Hashrate 57.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 57.9 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification Innosilicon T3+ 57T
375.0 TH/s Hashrate 57.0 TH/s
5,625 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 57.9 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level —
— Weight 10,380.0 kg
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
— Home Mining Score 22/100
— Release Year —
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00016964 BTC $12.07
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$1.43
Monthly -$43.03
Yearly -$523.52

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Daily Revenue 0.00002579 BTC $1.83
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$6.09
Monthly -$182.58
Yearly -$2,221.40

Based on BTC price of $71,126 and current network difficulty as of Apr 9, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The Innosilicon T3+ 57T holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Score: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T3+ 57T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-1.43/day compared to $-6.09/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 57T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Innosilicon T3+ 57T scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 57T runs at 57.9 J/TH — a difference of 42.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.

Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...

Compare Innosilicon T3+ 57T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.