Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1446

Avalon A1446

Hashrate 135.0 TH/s Power 3,310 W Efficiency 24.5 J/TH
VS

Block Proto Rig

Hashrate 819.0 TH/s Power 12,000 W Efficiency 14.7 J/TH

Avalon A1446 vs Block Proto Rig

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1446 Specification Block Proto Rig
135.0 TH/s Hashrate 819.0 TH/s
3,310 W Power Consumption 12,000 W
24.5 J/TH Efficiency 14.7 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 80 dB
12.8 kg Weight
11,294 BTU/hr BTU Output 40,944 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Block Inc

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1446

Daily Revenue 0.00006212 BTC $4.84
Daily Electricity -$7.94
Daily Profit -$3.10
Monthly -$93.07
Yearly -$1,132.41

Block Proto Rig

Daily Revenue 0.00037689 BTC $29.37
Daily Electricity -$28.80
Daily Profit $0.57
Monthly $17.15
Yearly $208.70

Based on BTC price of $77,932 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Block Proto Rig, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 507% more hashrate (135 vs 819 TH/s) in the Block Proto Rig's favour. The Avalon A1446 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Block Proto Rig — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1446 and Block Proto Rig diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Block Proto Rig 507% more hashrate (135 vs 819 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1446 72% better power draw (3,310 vs 12,000 W)
  • Block Proto Rig 40% better efficiency (24.5 vs 14.7 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1446 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
  • Block Proto Rig 263% more heat output (11,294 vs 40,944 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1446 Metric Block Proto Rig
$3,200 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.10 Daily net profit $0.57
-$4,332 Net after 1 year +$209
-$5,465 Net after 2 years +$417
-$6,597 Net after 3 years +$626
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Block Proto Rig

$3.67/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1446

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Block Proto Rig

14.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1446 or the Block Proto Rig?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Block Proto Rig is more profitable at $0.57/day compared to $-3.10/day for the Avalon A1446. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Avalon A1446 or the Block Proto Rig better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Avalon A1446 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Block Proto Rig at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1446 or Block Proto Rig?

The Avalon A1446 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Block Proto Rig). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1446 vs Block Proto Rig: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Block Proto Rig runs at 14.7 J/TH — a difference of 9.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (24.5 vs 14.7 J/TH).