Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 |
|---|---|---|
| 480.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 920.0 TH/s |
| 8,046 W | Power Consumption | 13,340 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| 80 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 20.0 kg | Weight | 37.0 kg |
| 27,453 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 45,516 BTU/hr |
| 23/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U
MicroBT WhatsMiner M79
Based on BTC price of $79,126 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 92% more hashrate (480 vs 920 TH/s). That said, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U and MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 92% more hashrate (480 vs 920 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 40% better power draw (8,046 vs 13,340 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 13% better efficiency (16.8 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 38% better noise (80.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U 46% better weight (20.0 vs 37.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 66% more heat output (27,453 vs 45,516 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 91% more home mining score (23.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,568 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.83 | Daily net profit | $1.48 |
| -$6,237 | Net after 1 year | +$541 |
| -$6,906 | Net after 2 years | +$1,083 |
| -$7,575 | Net after 3 years | +$1,624 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M79$3.32/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M79Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7914.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is more profitable at $1.48/day compared to $-1.83/day for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 23/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U and MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 2U runs at 16.8 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (16.8 vs 14.5 J/TH).