Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 841 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 TH/s |
| 1,290 W | Power Consumption | 3,980 W |
| 94.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,700.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 4,402 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,580 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 841
MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Based on BTC price of $77,862 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 1371% more hashrate (13.6 vs 200.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 and MicroBT Whatsminer M61 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 1371% more hashrate (13.6 vs 200.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 68% better power draw (1,290 vs 3,980 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 79% better efficiency (94.9 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 100% better weight (4,700.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 209% more heat output (4,402 vs 13,580 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 841 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,200 |
| -$2.61 | Daily net profit | -$2.39 |
| -$952 | Net after 1 year | -$3,071 |
| -$1,904 | Net after 2 years | -$3,942 |
| -$2,857 | Net after 3 years | -$4,812 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 841Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M6119.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 or MicroBT Whatsminer M61 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is more profitable at $-2.39/day compared to $-2.61/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 841. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M61). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan AvalonMiner 841 and MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 runs at 94.9 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 75.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (94.9 vs 19.9 J/TH).