Baikal BK-G28 vs StrongU STU-U6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-G28 | Specification | StrongU STU-U6 |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 440.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 46,428.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 5,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,550.0 kg | Weight | 7,200.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-G28
StrongU STU-U6
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the StrongU STU-U6 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1471% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s). The Baikal BK-G28 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-G28 and StrongU STU-U6 sit on each measurable spec:
- StrongU STU-U6 1471% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-G28 41% better power draw (1,300 vs 2,200 W)
- StrongU STU-U6 89% better efficiency (46,429 vs 5,000 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-G28 9% better weight (6,550 vs 7,200 kg)
- StrongU STU-U6 69% more heat output (4,436 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-G28 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Baikal BK-G28 | Metric | StrongU STU-U6 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,235 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$5.26 |
| -$1,138 | Net after 1 year | -$7,156 |
| -$2,277 | Net after 2 years | -$9,078 |
| -$3,415 | Net after 3 years | -$10,999 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-G28Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU STU-U65,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Baikal BK-G28 vs StrongU STU-U6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-G28 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-5.26/day for the StrongU STU-U6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Baikal BK-G28 or the StrongU STU-U6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Baikal BK-G28 vs StrongU STU-U6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal BK-G28 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Baikal BK-G28 vs StrongU STU-U6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Baikal BK-G28 runs at 46,428.6 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U6 runs at 5,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 41,428.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficiency (46,429 vs 5,000 J/TH).