iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink DM22G
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Specification | iBeLink DM22G |
|---|---|---|
| 32.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 22.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 810 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 36,818.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 12,200.0 kg | Weight | 19,000.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,764 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | X11 |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
iBeLink DM22G
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-K1 Max, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 145355% more hashrate (32.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-K1 Max's favour. The iBeLink DM22G claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink DM22G sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 145355% more hashrate (32.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink DM22G 75% better power draw (3,200 vs 810 W)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 100% better efficiency (100 vs 36,818 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 36% better weight (12,200 vs 19,000 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 295% more heat output (10,918 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink DM22G 27% more home mining score (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Metric | iBeLink DM22G |
|---|---|---|
| $1,250 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.53 | Daily net profit | -$1.94 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 1 year | -$709 |
| -$6,016 | Net after 2 years | -$1,419 |
| -$8,399 | Net after 3 years | -$2,128 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink DM22GScore: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K1 Max100.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or the iBeLink DM22G?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DM22G is more profitable at $-1.94/day compared to $-6.53/day for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink DM22G: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or the iBeLink DM22G?
The iBeLink DM22G scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink DM22G?
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH while the iBeLink DM22G runs at 36,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 36,718.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (100 vs 36,818 J/TH).