iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Specification | iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 3.5 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| 132.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 48.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 580 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 68/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 95% better power draw (3,300 vs 170 W) in the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)'s favour. The iBeLink BM-N3 claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N3 and iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N3 614% more hashrate (25.0 vs 3.5 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 95% better power draw (3,300 vs 170 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 63% better efficiency (132.0 vs 48.6 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 1841% more heat output (11,260 vs 580 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 209% more home mining score (22.0 vs 68.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Metric | iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| $980 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.02 | Daily net profit | -$0.28 |
| -$3,542 | Net after 1 year | -$103 |
| -$6,105 | Net after 2 years | -$206 |
| -$8,667 | Net after 3 years | -$309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)Score: 68/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)48.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-7.02/day for the iBeLink BM-N3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH): which runs at a lower noise level?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH): which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) scores 68/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) runs at 48.6 J/TH — a difference of 83.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (132.0 vs 48.6 J/TH).