iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 3.5 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 48.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 580 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 68/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 95% better power draw (3,400 vs 170 W). The iBeLink BM-KS Max claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 214% more hashrate (11.0 vs 3.5 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 95% better power draw (3,400 vs 170 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 84% better efficiency (309.1 vs 48.6 J/TH)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 82% better weight (12.2 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 1900% more heat output (11,601 vs 580 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 89% more home mining score (36.0 vs 68.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.28 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$103 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$206 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)Score: 68/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)48.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-KS Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) scores 68/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) runs at 48.6 J/TH — a difference of 260.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (309.1 vs 48.6 J/TH).