Goldshell CK Box II vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK Box II | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 400 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
| 190.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK Box II
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 54% better power draw (400 vs 185 W). That said, the Goldshell CK Box II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK Box II and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK Box II 62% more hashrate (2.1 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 54% better power draw (400 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 25% better efficiency (190 vs 142 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 28% better weight (3.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK Box II 116% more heat output (1,365 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Box II 3% more home mining score (34.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell CK Box II | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $246 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.88 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$569 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$892 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$1,214 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK Box IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell CK Box II vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-0.88/day for the Goldshell CK Box II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell CK Box II or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell CK Box II vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK Box II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell CK Box II and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 48.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (190 vs 142 J/TH).