iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 32.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 12,200.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-K1 Max edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 2362% more hashrate (32.0 vs 1.3 TH/s). The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 2362% more hashrate (32.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 94% better power draw (3,200 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 30% better efficiency (100 vs 142 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 100% better weight (12,200.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 1630% more heat output (10,918 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 50% more home mining score (22.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,250 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.53 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$6,015 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$8,398 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K1 Max100.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-6.53/day for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 42.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficiency (100 vs 142 J/TH).